Joint paper with Massimiliano Castelli, UBS. The recent decision by EU's finance ministers to suspend the Stability and Growth Pact has shown some weaknesses in EMU's economic policy framework. This is not surprising given the still short-lived EMU's history and the ongoing challenges posed by the European construction. While a new pact is badly needed, Switzerland's experience can provide some important insights in the current debate in Europe. Switzerland is per construction a small Europe. Like in the EU, Swiss states (cantons) are diverse in terms of income and industrial specialization. They operate in a monetary union with interest rates set out at a federal level and a flexible exchange rate determined in global financial markets. Like the euro area, Switzerland can hardly be defined as an optimal currency area. In addition, Switzerland is a multilingual country, which makes it more similar to the EU rather than to the US. Switzerland, however, differs from the euro area in terms of economic policy settings. Regarding monetary policy, the Swiss framework is relatively similar to the European one, but its fiscal policy strongly differs. The cleverly designed Helvetian fiscal policy framework is based on tax competition between cantons, full implementation of the subsidiarity principle, and a mechanism through which rich cantons transfer funds to poor ones. This perequation attenuates the negative side-effects of tax competition (e.g. no race to the bottom) by providing all cantons with sufficient resources to supply an adequate level of public goods. The mix of monetary integration, a credible monetary authority, and an effective fiscal setting makes the Swiss economic policy framework more stable and flexible than the European one. The European Central Bank's credibility is coupled with a fiscal policy framework based on clumsy tax harmonization and a rigid and arbitrary Stability and Growth Pact